Saturday 27 March 2010

Does the internet actually exist??

Just had am extraordinarily weird conversation about the nature of the internet with my daughter. Apparently the nature of networks is part of a course she is studying and this bought us to the subject of the internet in general and what, exactly, the internet actually is. By which I mean; does the internet actually exist, and if it does, where exactly it is and what form does it take. If something exists in strictly empirical terms it is usual to expect the ‘thing’ in question to have form and to be accessible to and detectable by our senses. The internet very obviously doesn’t fall into this category. My computer, which does exist in these terms, can be used to show images and hear sounds from the internet, but it’s not the internet itself, it’s a computer, a machine which is easily understood as being part of the ‘real’ and empirically validated world.
Which led us to ask; ‘’if the internet actually exists, and if it doesn’t exist in empirical form, what category of existence does the internet fall into and how is it’s existence defined’’?
‘’And if it does exist in empirical terms how does this definition work’’??
I can’t be the only person to have thought of this, there must be some clever philosophical thinker out there who has defined the existence of the internet and I would really like to know how this definition works.
These questions seem important to me, if things are now accepted as having ‘being’ without being subject to empirical scrutiny, that opens up a whole lot of space for a whole lot of debate about the definition of existence. This website said  ''frequently asked questions about the internet'' but it didn't answer my question.

http://emeagwali.com/history/internet/

54 comments:

  1. i would say it is energy put to good use. Like electricity you can not see that either , but put your finger in a light socket and you will feel it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. and feeling it is the empirical sense based evidence that need to know it exists

    ReplyDelete
  3. MOST interesting! I have some thinkin ta do on this one!

    ReplyDelete
  4. ohhhh I'm so happy someone takes my question seriously thank you, think away and then get back to me :-)

    ReplyDelete
  5. does comunication exist
    it is process and not content ?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Maybe it is all fake and we are talking to ourselves

    ReplyDelete
  7. depends on exactly what you mean. The nature of language and how it works has been the subject of philosophical debate for centuries but most people who debate the nature of language seem to agree that, even if the thought processes are not actually understood, the mechanics of brain activity and brain chemistry are (almost) understood. But if you mean does the mechanics that allow us to communicate, be it speech which utilises muscle etc or the written word which uses paper etc..., exist, then yes they do, empirically.

    ReplyDelete
  8. thank you :-)
    it helps a great deal, how appropriate

    ReplyDelete
  9. the internet is many forms in one system
    it is data entered into a electronic devise
    like me typing this right now
    it is entered into my ip port
    then send digitally through my cable tv wire
    to a station that send them as (i believe) microwave signals
    up to a satellite in space then broadcast back down
    to a station near you
    then you access them from there

    the internet is the network of stations that broadcasts and receives those signals

    :)

    ReplyDelete
  10. Empirical simply implies something derived or guided from or by experience or experiment. The issue doesn't have to have physical form, much as radio waves. The Internet is a series of communications connections, essentially computer-to-server-to-server-to-computer. The starting, midway and ending points have a physical existence, the transmission in between is simply energy. Not unlike the physical existence of a television studio and then the receiving television set, with nothing empirical in between. Does the Internet have an actual physical home? The answer is no, it is a collective identity. Does the Universe have an empirical 'home'?

    ReplyDelete
  11. the signals are wavelengths you can not see

    like the signal from your tv remote to your tv
    or our voices traveling if we were on the phone

    :)

    ReplyDelete
  12. one of the difference between tv, radio AND THE INTERNET is that ordinary people communicate in real time through wires or waves...a bit like the telphone but everything visual and heard can be saved

    ReplyDelete
  13. ok... Frank and Nemo, when I ask ''what form of existance does the internet have' you are saying it has the form of 'waves' energy waves or microwaves or sound waves..... or similar. And these 'waves' are energy that have no physical form but do have some sort of 'real' existance??

    ReplyDelete
  14. Yes, pretty much so, all energy has existence, although not always visible properties. Unfortunately, every stroke/signal that travels from point-to-point will exist forever, one doesn't 'erase' energy, simply disburses it. But you can't wrap it up in a neat little package with a physical existence. It is a label.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Yes, pretty much so, all energy has existence, although not always visible properties. Unfortunately, every stroke/signal that travels from point-to-point will exist forever, one doesn't 'erase' energy, simply disburses it. But you can't wrap it up in a neat little package with a physical existence. It is a label.

    ReplyDelete
  16. hmmmmm ok.............guess one of the problems I have with this is that it is so big. In my conversation with my daughter we asked the question; if the Internet were around 500 years ago, and Shakespeare used it, would we still be able to see what he wrote??, cos..................if that were the case, the amount of stuff stored on the internet over 500 years would be infinite..... does the internet have infinite capability?? cos if it does, its just about the only 'thing' in existence that does have infinity inbuilt. generally speaking infinity is something not experience in the 'real' world.

    ReplyDelete
  17. i may be wrong on this

    the information still has to be stored somewhere on a devise (computer, cell phone etc))
    the internet is just the connections between devises
    like our old 360 posts
    they are gone now because the computers they were stored on no longer exist

    :)

    ReplyDelete
  18. If Shakespeare had been on the Internet and been transmitted, it would still be around today, perhaps in a galaxy far, far away, but out there some where. The light that we see from stars on a given night, may have been generated thousands, perhaps millions, of years ago and has traveled at light speed and take that long to get here. The point is that the original energy was disbursed, but not destroyed. If some device today could read what was transmitted, I believe that it would still be around. That is like the signals and pictures that we sent into space 40 years ago.

    ReplyDelete
  19. the waves continue to travel
    the waves sent to a satellite
    not in a circle but traveling outward on
    but i would think they would become corrupt past a point
    like martians watching broadcast re-runs of "i love lucy"
    the broadcast waves may still be traveling out
    but are they usable?
    and they would have to come to a receiver that could translate it

    ReplyDelete
  20. Hmmm i was wondering about this, I thought, just as Frank said, once out there on the internet, it stays on the internet, which makes me wonder how much stuff the internet can store. I know what you mean about not being able to access it because 360 doesn't exist, but our not being able to access it doesn't mean its not there,

    ReplyDelete
  21. which must mean that every thing we write, in theory, would be accessible by our descendants thousands of years from now.

    ReplyDelete
  22. check the first part of this out

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet

    the internet is a collective of stations that receive and forward your info
    what they talk about things sent that can be accessed by others even though you delete it
    it means the message you just sent went through many stations to get it me
    those places will have a record of it on their devices
    but if those devices are destroyed so is the info on them
    what you sent is not just circling the globe forever

    :)

    ReplyDelete
  23. interesting-too "deep" for me lol I just enjoy all my friends here and learn from the internet

    ReplyDelete
  24. ok so if the energy was distributed not destroyed it would no longer be in the form of internet communications but in the form of light or sound some other energy force. Which makes a lot more sense than it remaining with us as an internet communication for all eternity. Because if it did the internet would be infinite and nothing in our reality is infinite, and if the internet was...........it really would be a different sort of existence.

    ReplyDelete
  25. and that is a very wise attitude Kathy, there's a lot to be said for 'just' enjoying things without too many questions.

    ReplyDelete
  26. think of it this way

    i am on land and you are on an island across a bay
    i am sending you morse code signals with a flashlight
    i turn on and off the switch
    which sends bursts of light your way
    this light is moving in waves at the speed of light
    the wavelengths hit you and you see them and make out what i am sending
    (wow! ~ i didn't know you knew morse code)
    but the waves don't stop there
    someone behind you can see it too
    but sooner or later the waves disperse
    if i lit a flashlight in ohio
    you can not see it were you are

    :)

    ReplyDelete
  27. ahhhhh big sigh...............ok i'm beginning to get the mechanics of it all, but I have to admit there are still aspects of the internet that to me, break with previously understood definitions of 'reality', or existence or similar things. But thank you people for your input :-)

    ReplyDelete
  28. That's up for debate, what is sent is a series of mathematical codes that are then deciphered by the receiving computer and become pictures and words again. The codes still exist as signals or waves, with or without the computer to do the physical translation. Where are the signals/waves, they are out there somewhere, they are not captured and held or locked-in by the receiving computer, they can't be destroyed. A change to the original transmission would produce a new set of mathematical codes and signals, the original doesn't change or just go away. There is a distinction between the energy to transmit an image and the resultant image, they are two different things.

    ReplyDelete
  29. I love the definition of the Internet from the IT Crowd, meaning a black box kept on top of Big Ben. However, I think you have more logical explanations here.

    ReplyDelete
  30. you are welcome

    this has been a most fun conversation

    :)

    ReplyDelete
  31. now you've confused me again. So... the energy used to transmit the 'image' on the internet is dispersed and changes, but the 'image' that is being transmitted does not change and is around for ever even if and when there is no means of recovering this 'image'. Which brings me back to infinity, if every thing the internet sends remains unchanged and is 'out there somewhere', the internet is potentially infinite which is not something previously part of our experience.

    ReplyDelete
  32. logical or not I rather like this IT crowd :-)

    ReplyDelete
  33. i still contend that sooner or later the waves break down
    they do travel on past the point of reception
    like the people behind you seeing my flashlight in my example
    plus the lifetime of certain waves is strong

    but sooner or later they do brake down
    like frank said about seeing the stars
    true we can see the light
    but not the warmth as from our star the sun
    and there is to much to corrupt them in the world

    :)

    ReplyDelete
  34. Yes, all this almost intangible stuff is stored somewhere, using HUGE amount of energy. Each one of our clicks produces heat. More energy is used to cool the servers.
    Guess in a close future, we-all will be taxed on the number of clicks ;-D
    Sorry to spoil the fun, I think in fact I like better the ethereal explanation and wil stick to it from now on ;-D

    ReplyDelete
  35. This stuff is way over my head. Why don't you and your daughter talk about bunny rabbits?

    Basically if the internet doesn't exist, what do I tell my Wife I've been looking at for the past few years?

    ReplyDelete

  36. Almost a transcendental post...
    Animal. Vegetable. Mineral. Which leads me to rock, paper, scissors.
    hehehe

    XOXO
    me

    ReplyDelete

  37. Credit where credit is due, you made me laugh out loud!

    XOXO
    me

    ReplyDelete
  38. wouldn't that be transcendental masturbation?

    lol

    :)

    ReplyDelete
  39. I don't know what to add, except the definition of empirical:
    1 : originating in or based on observation or experience
    2 : relying on experience or observation alone often without due regard for system and theory
    3 : capable of being verified or disproved by observation or experiment

    So the existence of the internet can be easily be verified by your senses as opposed to having someone just tell you there is something called the internet and you take it on their word or by inductive/deductive reasoning.

    ReplyDelete
  40. This has much to be thought about within what you have wrote, I just logged on and I have to come back and think about this - tremendous area that you came up with.

    Very thought provoking!

    ReplyDelete
  41. it's a series of tubes
    twisted tangled up tubes

    massive, massive tubes!!!

    http://realitychecks.multiply.com/music/item/1/

    ReplyDelete
  42. the internet is millions of computers all wired together, communicating with one another. the network alone without the computers would be nothing, just a jumble of wiring basically. the computers without the network of wiring would all just be individual computers, isolated from one another. how useful is that?

    this world makes an interesting metaphor. the world is made up of people. take away the people and what world is it? it isn't. if you were to isolate all the people then what would you have? so much for that. put them all together and you have The World.

    maybe it would make sense if a friend who used the Internet before html and the www and al gore would reminisce about how it all was. totally different animal now.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Internet to me is an outer reflection of inner reality, the Inner Net, the state of being constantly connected and in communication, and it's no accident that the internet becomes faster and more all inlcusive as our awareness of all the inner connections and continual communication widens. The internet reflects what we've been doing all along but weren't aware of ~ communicating with all, continually, and there is a growing awareness that "reality" and consciousness are way more than what you can see in the physical.

    ReplyDelete
  44. opens up a whole lot of space for a whole lot of debate about the definition of existence.

    Quite ;)

    ReplyDelete
  45. What is a book, for that matter ~ it's more than the pages of paper bound together with ink symbols on it, it communicates the story, but it isn't The Story in itself

    ReplyDelete
  46. I like your thinking................and tend to agree

    ReplyDelete
  47. thats what I call a reality check Nemo :-))

    ReplyDelete