I've just come from a hotly debated page of a political group and one of my contacts has just said to me....
''But I am curious - of your American contacts, what is the feeling about healthcare and the current contraceptive debate? If you have a mind to, ask them what their issues and priorities are. I don't know, but it might elucidate the issue. It has me baffled. ''...............
So ladies.........all answers, opinions and thoughts gratefully received. Don't worry, I promise this is not where I or any one else jump on people we don't agree with, this is purely an opinion finding exercise. I'm just asking the questions that I have been asked to ask :-)
Thanks ladies.
ps.............the picture at the top is irrelevant to the post..........I just like it.
This is what ever Multiply decides to 'export'. There will be no new posts here, this is for every thing from Multiply and 360 that the 'export tool' safely delivers.
Showing posts with label political. Show all posts
Showing posts with label political. Show all posts
Friday, 16 March 2012
Feedback needed from all American ladies
Tuesday, 28 February 2012
Truth about the Health and Social Care Bill
Written February 2012 by Professor Ian Banks
Dr Jacky Davis
Dr Clive Peedell
Dr David Wrigley
Health and Social Care Bill Briefing
This Health Bill is bad for the NHS and bad for our patients, bad policy and poor politics.
This is not a party political issue. Many doctors campaigned against New Labour’s market based NHS reforms because they believed that a publicly funded, publicly provided, and publically accountable NHS is the most cost effective and equitable way of delivering healthcare to our population.
We believe the Health and Social Care Bill is not the answer to the problems of the NHS and will in fact make things worse not better. We believe that the case for such a radical change to the NHS has not been made. There is no electoral mandate given that neither of the coalition parties stood for election on the basis of introducing such an enormous re-organisation of the NHS.
If the bill goes through costs will go up rather than down. Bureaucracy will increase from 3 layers to 7. The service will be fragmented and the transactional nature of the new healthcare market will undermine medical professionalism and the doctor patient relationship. Power will not be in the hands of doctors and patients but rather in the hands of private companies who will have an ever increasing role in both commissioning and delivering NHS care.
The number of services provided by the NHS will decline over the next few years and increasing numbers of patients will take out health insurance to widen their coverage. This process will be catalysed by the NHS efficiency drive we now see as services start to fail and commissioning groups come under enormous pressure to reduce costs. This will then place enormous financial pressure on Foundation Trusts, which will need to treat increasing proportions of private patients to stay afloat. This is why Foundation Trust hospitals will be able to earn up to 49% of their income from private patients. Where does this leave NHS patients without the financial means to go private?
There is little doubt that the intention of this bill is to denationalise the English NHS, by removing the duties and powers of the Secretary of State to provide a comprehensive service. Thus the crossbencher Lord Owen has called this the “Secretary of State abdication bill”.
Politicians claim that ‘no change is not an option’ but we must ask why. International studies show that the NHS is highly cost effective and that outcomes are rapidly improving. NHS productivity is increasing and patient satisfaction is at the highest levels ever recorded. We have to ask - what is the problem to which this legislation is the solution?
The bill is 3 times longer than the original 1948 Health Bill and is littered with 100s of new amendments. Hamish Meldrum (chair BMA) said it was “hopelessly complex”. The new Chair of the NHS National Commissioning Board, Professor Malcolm Grant, who is a lawyer, said it was “unintelligible”.
But the latest amendments in Parliament do little address the fundamental underlying structural changes of the bill that will undermine the NHS. Andrew Lansley told his backbenchers after the listening exercise in 2011 that all red lines were still in place. The government has had 18 months to listen and they have failed to do so, despite claiming that this was about listening to doctors and patients.
There is widespread recognition amongst NHS professionals that something is deeply wrong with this bill. The level of opposition is unprecedented and ranges from the usual suspects of the health unions, right through to members of the Cabinet of the Government. There are at least 23 professional groups in opposition including frontline staff as well as NHS managers. The highly critical joint editorial from the BMJ, HSJ and Nursing Times was a watershed moment.
Surveys of the RCGP have shown that the vast majority of GPs want the bill withdrawn. Doctors wish to try and improve local healthcare (via commissioning) but not via this damaging Health Bill. There is absolutely no need for this Bill for doctor led commissioning to successfully take place.
Clare Gerada (Chair of RCGP) has stated:
“GPs don’t think the bill is going to create a patient led NHS, they don’t think it is going to increase autonomy, they don’t think it is going to improve patient care, and they don’t think it is going to improve healthcare inequalities”
Professor Lyndsey Davies, Chair of the UK Faculty of Public Health, which has just publicly called for withdrawal of the bill, has stated that: “the majority of our members now believe that the Health and Social Care Bill, if passed, will damage the NHS and the health of people in England”
Mark Pearson, head of health at the OECD says
"The UK is one of the best performers in the world. But outcomes are not what you expect because there is a big reform every five years. We calculate that each reform costs two years of improvements in quality. No country reforms its health service as frequently as the UK,"
When it was put to Pearson, a respected economist, that the NHS faces its biggest upheaval in 60 years with the coalition's health bill, he said: "The NHS is so central to the political process that every politician has to promise to improve the NHS. But there's no big reform that will improve it. Better to let it bed down and tinker rather than wondering about more or less competition. It is less the type of system that counts, but rather how it is managed."
President of the RCPCH, Professor Terence Stephenson, said:
“It is clear that a substantial majority of our voting members believe that the Health and Social Care Bill carries risk for children and young people. Despite revisions and assurances from Government, there remains widespread and deep concern amongst not only our members, but also the wider health profession and public, about the Bill’s impact on patient care.”
The Medical Royal Colleges have an important role to play in opposing the bill. Their remit is teaching, training, and standards of care and for these reasons they should be very concerned about the effect of market reforms on medical training and standards.
It is common knowledge that the government has recently applied pressure to the Medical Royal Colleges not to come out publicly against the bill. How can legislation that is meant to empower us be forced through by threatening us? This behaviour is indicative of how very afraid the government are of opposition from our professional bodies.
Doctors are ready to get behind their College to back them every step of the way.
It is not too late to stop this bill. The argument that is currently being used i.e. there is more pain in stopping than dropping the bill is nonsense. If you are in a hole you should stop digging. There are many coherent suggestions as to how to stabilise the situation we now find ourselves in. Having got us into a mess it is unacceptable to use the mess as an excuse to press on with the bill in the face of opposition from the vast majority of professionals.
We must stand firmly together for what we believe is right. We must stand firmly together against political interference in our clinical judgement. Only in this way can we gain respect from those we represent and those we deal with, only in this way will we gain real influence and only in this way can we protect the profession and our patients now and in the future.
www.callonyourcollege.blogspot.com
St Pauls Occupy Site Evicted Last Night
An anti-capitalist demonstration that saw protesters camp outside St Paul's Cathedral in London has been brought to an end by bailiffs and police.
Protesters staging Occupy London were refused permission by the Court of Appeal last week to challenge orders evicting them from the cathedral steps, where they had been living in tents since October 15 last year.
The City of London Corporation called on protesters to remove their tents voluntarily, but around 50 or 60 refused to budge.
Some protesters created makeshift barriers out of wooden shelving units as police moved in to help bailiffs clear the camp.
Police said 20 people had been arrested but the operation was largely peaceful.
Giles Fraser, who resigned as canon chancellor of St Paul's rather than see protesters cleared out by force, said: "Riot police clearing the steps of St Paul's Cathedral was a terrible sight. This is a sad day for the Church."
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/police-evict-protesters-st-pauls-003237327.html
Monday, 20 February 2012
The Greek Hero; Manolis Glezos

The Greek hero
Manolis Glezos, born 9th September 1922
Seventy years ago, Manolis Glezos surreptitiously took down the Nazi flag flying over the Acropolis. Now aged almost 90, he's taken up the fight once more. This time, against the government, EU and IMF over what he feels are unjust attacks on Greece's economic sovereignty.
In March 2010, Glezos ( age 87) was participating in a protest demonstration in Athens, when he was hit in the face by a police tear gas canister. He was carried away injured.
In Feburary 2012, ( age amost 90) Glezos was arrested by riot police while protesting in Athens. He was sprayed with teargas by one of the police officers in that area.

The hero of Greece's anti-Nazi resistance movement, Manolis Glezos, has appealed to anti-capitalist protesters to "overturn a rotten system". Leading the fight in a very different sort of war, the leftwing icon said his nation had become a "guinea pig" for austerity measures to which no country was immune.
Full article here.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/feb/18/greece-wartime-hero-denounces-cuts
Sunday, 19 February 2012
A Greek Tragedy
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." - John F. Kennedy
A Greek Tragedy
What is happening in Greece has happened over many years in poor African countries, why should be we be surprised that Greek hospitals are running out of medicines, that Greek pensioners pay more than half of their meager pension back as ‘austerity tax’? Why should the world be surprised at any of this when we already know that debt repayment was allowed to completely destroy fragile health services and education systems in countless developing countries across the world. Greece is being forced into poverty unknown in modern Europe by the austerity restrictions demanded by IMF and the EU. None of us can afford to sit back smugly and think it couldn’t happen here, because it could, the next European economy to collapse could be Portugal or Spain or even Ireland, none of us are safe. And if our economy completely collapses do you think the elite bunch of millionaires running this country are going to suffer…………..I think not.
. One in five adults and one in two young people in Greece are unemployed. Homelessness, which was hardly known in Athens before the crisis, has become widespread. Tens of thousands of small businesses have gone bankrupt due to drastic tax increases.
The wealthy Greek elite are hardly affected by the austerity measures. According to Handelsblatt, they have deposited €560 billion in foreign accounts, a sum nearly twice as large as Greece's entire national debt.
the IMF are demanding budget cuts of €3.3 billion for this year alone—and all at the expense of the working class.
Health spending is to be cut by €1.1 billion,
15,000 state employees will be sacked in the coming year,
150,000 are to be made redundant over the next four years.
The federal minimum wage, upon which 300,000 people depend, is to be reduced from €750 to €600,
unemployment benefits reduced from €460 to €360 a month.
Supplementary pensions, which many Greeks depend upon for their survival, will be cut by 15 percent.
Private sector wages are to be reduced by 20 percent
"Because the lowered minimum wage will provide the base line for future wage negotiations, wage cuts are expected to be major," said James Nixon of the Société Générale bank.
The more I trawled YouTube looking for videos and the more I trawled the net looking for other peoples opinions, the more I found ordinary people waking up to the fact that democracy is dead and the rich and powerful rule the world.
There is no democracy any more, the rich and powerful make all the decisions, control the wealth and don’t give a dam about the rest of us. We all need to wake up.
I happened to visit another page here and found a whole lot of links and videos relating to the Greek situation, thanks Tracey for allowing me to re-post
http://stillwandering.multiply.com/journal/item/2379/Greeks_R_Us
This guy is also worth a visit.
Cynical
http://youpayyourcrisis.blogspot.com/2012/02/greece-default-or-devastation.html
http://youpayyourcrisis.blogspot.com/2012/02/appeal-for-solidarity-with-people-of.html?showComment=1329562166218#comment-c5846775331975053560
Saturday, 18 February 2012
Disability benefit cuts.
you think we ( in the UK) look after our disabled, think again. And if the government has its way, things are about to get a whole lot worse.In Scotland we are in a precarious position, our devolved government has voiced its opposition to these cuts but; at the moment they are powerless to act against them because ‘work and pensions’ is not a devolved department of government. At the moment the DWP ( department of work and pensions) is governed from Westminster for the whole of the UK.
This is what the SNP MSP for Glasgow Bob Doris has to say,
“If the UK Government press on with plans to compel sick and disabled people, including those with mental health issues into long term compulsory unpaid work or to lose benefits is simply unacceptable.
“For the DWP to call this an 'incentive' is simply farcical and like so much of its welfare reforms the UK Government need to think again before significant and long term damage is done to many of Scotland's most vulnerable groups.
“If work and pensions were devolved to the Scottish Parliament we would be able to have a system based on fairness that meets the needs and demands of everyone in Scotland including the most needy and sick people who are limited in their ability to work.”
http://www.snp.org/media-centre/news/2012/feb/uk-gov-workfare-scheme-incentive%E2%80%99-farcical
If you wonder what sort of people want to push sick and disabled people further into poverty………its this sort;
The DWP is governed by;
The Rt Hon Iain Duncan Smith MP Secretary of State Overall responsibility
The Rt Hon Chris Grayling MP Minister of State Employment
Steve Webb MP Minister of State Pensions
Maria Miller MP Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State Disabled people
Lord Freud Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State Welfare reform
The Liberal/Conservative coalition government of 2010 has been described as a 'coalition of millionaires' because 23 of its 29 MP's who are entitled to attend Cabinet meetings have assets and investments estimated to be worth more than £1million.
Iain Duncan Smith is one of the 23 millionaires, he is also an advocate of strict immigration controls because he believes ‘’ tighter immigration controls are vital if Britain is to avoid losing another generation to dependency and hopelessness”. Presumably from that statement he believes immigrants are ‘’dependant and hopeless’. He lied on his CV claiming he has a degree and various other qualifications, in fact he has no formal qualifications. He supported the launching of a pre-emptive attack on Iraq, prior to the 2003 invasion, because he argued 'It’s now time for the prime minister to explain to the British people what he already knows - that Iraq is a clear and growing danger to Britain’’.
Chris Grayling, the Minister of State for Employment is also a homophobic who publicly supported the ‘right’ of B&B owners to refuse entry to gay and lesbian couples. He was one of the main culprits in the parliamentary expenses scandal. Between 2001 and 2009 he claimed parliamentary expenses for a flat in Pimlico, close to the House of Commons, despite having a constituency home less than 17 miles away.. He also owned two buy to let properties in Wimbledon. Grayling says he uses the flat when "working very late" because he needs to "work very erratic and late hours most days when the House of Commons is sitting." During the Parliamentary expenses scandal, The Daily Telegraph reported that Grayling refitted and redecorated the flat in 2005 at a cost of thousands of pounds to the tax payer. And unsurprisingly he is also one of the many millionaires in government.
And these are the people who want to impose draconian cuts on the most vulnerable members of society ………the only surprise is that any one voted for them in the first place.
We ALL need to be vocal in fighting these cuts.
Monday, 13 February 2012
Trump................Grrrrrrrrr
Grrrrr what an idiot that bloody man is. Please please please please take him home. He's wrong on so many counts its not even worth bothering to argue. The only thing that has been foisted on 'the people' (us) is HIM. Thursday, 26 January 2012
Trumps fight against the wind turbines.
To cut a long story short…………..there are plans to build 11 huge wind turbines (supposedly 64 stories high) a mile and a half off the coast of the Menie Estate. If, they get built – and it looks like they will – Donald Tramp will have excellent views of them from his golf course, from his clubhouse, from his hotel and from the luxury housing he plans ( planned) to build around the site. As he says himself, the turbines are going to be 64 storeys high. You have to understand Mr tramp is completely selfless in his quest to have this project stopped. His objections are purely on behalf of the Scottish landscape whose flawless beauty he is committed to preserving. I’ll bet you never knew the man was a conservationist, apparently he is. So upset, was he, by the potential damage wrecked upon our precious landscape that he is quoted as saying “Speaking both selfishly and as somebody who loves Scotland, the birthplace of my mother, I hope that the mistake of building these massive and visually destructive power plants is avoided. Don’t be misled. Your coastline will be forever ruined. Your wildlife will be devastated. And your valuable tax revenues wasted.”
How nice that he cares.
Unfortunately for him, and of course for the future of our coastline and wildlife, his friends in high places who supported his non damaging and non invasive onslaught into our environment, are no longer his friends when it comes to the wind farm.
Developing renewable energy is one of THE most important policies of Alex Salmond’s leadership. Previously, Salmond has been a Tramp supporter in the golf course saga. However, no golf course, however grand, is likely to have any where near the support of a renewable energy project. To Mr Tramps utter bewilderment, Alex Salmond is offering zilch support in his protests over the wind farm. Maybe poor Mr Tramp doesn’t read the papers, maybe he didn’t realize there’s not a lot the Scottish government takes more seriously than renewable energy, and the jobs it will offer.
Now Mr Tramp is apparently threatening to abandon the whole golf course project if ( when) the wind turbines get the go ahead. Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Read the whole thing, it’s a good read.
http://www.scotsman.com/sport/golf/tom_english_trump_will_either_win_you_over_or_run_you_over_1_2064363
Wednesday, 18 January 2012
Scottish Independence

http://home.scotland.gov.uk/home
http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Business-Industry/Energy/Energy-sources
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Scotland
http://www.forestry.gov.uk/forestry/HCOU-4UCGGJ
http://devolutionmatters.wordpress.com/2011/12/23/the-2012-olympics-and-the-barnett-formula-an-end-to-the-row/
http://www.nfus.org.uk/farming-facts/what-we-produce
WARNING;
THIS IS A PRETTY LONG READ,
AND FOR SOME PROBABLY A BIT BORING,
BUT IF YOU WANT TO KNOW WHY I THINK SCOTLAND
SHOULD GAIN INDEPENDENCE
READ ON
Scottish Independence is THE hot topic of conversation again and the question most people ask is ‘could Scotland survive on her own? My answer to that………oh yes.THIS IS A PRETTY LONG READ,
AND FOR SOME PROBABLY A BIT BORING,
BUT IF YOU WANT TO KNOW WHY I THINK SCOTLAND
SHOULD GAIN INDEPENDENCE
READ ON
The assumption seems to be that Scotland would be more vulnerable and less economically viable as an independent Nation. It’s a common belief that England subsidises Scotland financially and without those subsidies Scotland’s economy would collapse, taxes would rise and living standards would fall. My standard response to that is ‘’Independence is not primarily a matter of economy it’s about national Identity and the right of a Nation to self determination’’. And I do believe that, but I also believe Scotland would flourish politically and economically as an Independent Nation. There’s not one single reason why an Independent Scotland should fail.
To put it into some sort of perspective compare Scotland with Norway
Scotland has a population of 5.2 million, Norway has a population of about 4.9 million.
Norway has extensive reserves of petroleum, natural gas, minerals, lumber, seafood, fresh water, and hydropower. Norway, is a net exporter of energy.
Scotland has some of the best energy resources in Europe, and is a net exporter of electricity. At present it has a generating capacity of 10.1GW primarily from coal, oil and gas with some nuclear generation. This is supplemented with an ever increasing amount of renewable energy.
Gas and oil
The great majority of the UK's oil production and around half of its gas production comes from fields based in the continental shelf around Scotland, and mines in Scotland are responsible for around a quarter of the UK's coal production.
Fossil fuels are a finite resource which is why Scotland's ability to produce renewable energy is so important but; while the UK still has fossil fuels most of it is produced off the coast of Scotland. Considering Scotland has a population of only 5 million compared to the total UK population of almost 70 million, Scotland has a huge advantage when it comes to energy production and energy potential.
Renewables
Scotland has been identified as having vast potential for the development of renewable energy. There is potential wave, tidal and wind power in abundance. Scotland's wind and seas hold some of the most concentrated potential not only across the UK and Europe, but in the world, with an estimated 25% of Europe's offshore wind and wave potential and 10% Europe’s tidal capacity.
Scotland accounts for around nine per cent of the UK's total energy consumption, but is rich in energy resources. Around 20 per cent of the electricity generated in Scotland NOW is exported to the rest of the UK, as the renewable energy becomes more available, Scotland’s energy excess will increase leaving more and more energy available for export. With nearly 7 gigawatts of renewable energy now either, installed and producing, or in the pipeline, Scotland is expected to meet its target for renewables to generate 100 per cent of gross annual electricity demand by 2020, just 8 short years away. I would say that any nation with the potential to be self sufficient in renewable energy by 2020 AND have the capacity to export energy, is not a nation that need worry about its economy.
Wave and tidal energy
Scotland possesses a huge wave and tidal energy resource; the potential exists to generate far more electricity than would ever be needed from wave and tidal energy sources in the waters around the Scottish coast. Wave energy is intermittent but relatively predictable, whereas tidal current energy is intermittent but largely predictable. Some of the best resources in the world for wave energy are located off the north-west coast and northern tip of Scotland - the world's first commercial wave energy device continues to produce power on the shoreline at Islay.
Wave and tidal energy will make a very important contribution towards meeting future demands for electricity; that is why Scotland helped fund the construction of the European Marine Energy Centre on Orkney. This Centre is a world class facility for the development, testing and accreditation of marine energy generation and delivery systems.
Biomass energy
Apart from fossil fuels, biomass is the only other naturally-occurring, energy-containing carbon resource large enough to be used as a substitute for fossil fuels. Biomass includes plant matter, vegetation and trees, as well as waste biomass such as municipal solid waste (MSW), municipal biosolids (sewage) and animal wastes (manures), forestry and agricultural residues, and certain types of industrial wastes. Unlike fossil fuels, biomass is renewable in the sense that only a short period of time is needed to replace what is used as an energy resource. Biomass is also held to be "carbon neutral", in that the amount of carbon it absorbs while growing is the same as the amount it produces when burned. Scotland has a potentially huge wood fuel resource arising from its forests and associated timber resource. Biomass energy could be extremely valuable in Scotland, given its lack of intermittency, its ability to meet local and small-scale energy needs and its potential to provide and sustain jobs.
Solar energy
Scotland’s long hours of summer daylight and demand for heat and hot water even when it's sunny makes it a prime candidate for the development of solar energy technologies. Solar applications are usually small scale and can supply electricity or heat on a domestic scale which is probably why solar panels on the roofs of houses are becoming a common sight across Scotland.
The energy industry is big business in Scotland, Aberdeen is the oil capital of Europe. This puts the country in the unique position of already having the business expertise, infrastructure and work force ready willing and waiting for the industry to diversify into renewables as the North Sea Oil and gas becomes scarcer.
Water
Scotland has an abundance of fresh pure water. In Scotland, public drinking water and sewerage services are provided by a public sector corporation, Scottish Water, which is accountable to Scottish Ministers and through Ministers to the Scottish Parliament. In England and Wales these services are delivered by private profit led companies.
Scottish Water operates within a regulatory framework established by the Scottish Parliament in which Scottish Ministers, acting on behalf of the people of Scotland, set the objectives for the industry to be delivered at least cost to customers.
The water industry contributes to the Scottish Government's Strategic Objectives, specifically the objective ‘’ A wealthier and Fairer Scotland’’
Unlike other parts of the UK Scotland has more water than it will ever need, in fact there have been suggestions that water could be exported from Scotland to England.
BUT;
important though they are, a country can’t survive on energy and water alone.
The Economy of Scotland
The Scottish labour market has performed better than the UK as a whole during the last year (2011). Over the year employment in Scotland has risen by 14,000 while unemployment has fallen by 14,000. Scotland's employment rate is higher than in the UK (71.2% vs. 70.2%), and unemployment is lower (8.0% vs. 8.3%).
There is a slow recovery in the Scottish economy which is continuing, but along with the rest of the world, recovery is fragile. This says more about the world recession than it does about Scotland’s ability to survive in the world independently. The very fact that some progress has been made is encouraging. Output in Scotland grew by 1.1% last year.
The economy of Scotland is closely linked with the rest of the UK and Europe. When assessing the economy of Scotland; the revenue from North Sea oil and gas is never included, but all monies passed from Westminster to Scotland are, which makes it appear as if Scotland’s outgoings are greater than its incomes. However, it’s widely accepted if North Sea revenues were included in the equation, as they would be in an Independent Scotland, Scotland would have a small budget surplus. In 2011-12, North Sea oil and gas is forecast to generate £13.4 billion in tax revenue, a record high in nominal terms. And over the five years from 2011-12 to 2015-16 it is forecast to raise £61 billion in tax revenue, 35 per cent more than during the previous five years. And under the present system of administration ALL of that revenue goes directly to Westminster and bypasses Scotland.
The Scottish timber industry and Scotland's timber resources
Scotland’s forests are the most productive in the UK. They make a significant contribution to Scotland’s economy through jobs in the wood processing industry, forest management, wood haulage and associated industries.
At the start of the 20th century, Scotland (like the rest of
the UK) depended almost entirely on imported wood.
This led to supply problems during the naval blockades of WW1. At the time the shortage of wood for pit props threatened the UK’s main source of energy, which at the time was coal. In 1919 this led to the founding of the Forestry Commission with the specific aim of ensuring sufficient supplies of home grown timber. Since then, nearly 10,000 km2of new forest have been created in Scotland – and almost half of this was planted between 1965 and 1990. Presuming that average consumption per person in Scotland
is the same as in the rest of the UK, the total consumption in Scotland is about 7.5 million m3 wood. This compares with Scotland’s annual wood harvest of 5.5 million m3, this leaves Scotland 73% per cent self sufficient in wood as a raw material..
In practice, Scotland imports more than the balance of 2 million m3, but also exports large amounts of wood, especially to the rest of the UK
In 1980, just over 1.5 million m3 of wood was harvested from
Scotland’s forests; by 2000 this had reached 5.5 million m3 per
year. Since then production, the associated industries and exports continue to increase. Scotland's managed forests are entirely sustainable and as the newer forests mature, the wood harvest will continue to grow, approaching 10 million m3 per year by 2020 which is estimated to exceed Scotland’s demand for wood.
Fishing Industry
Scotland's main sea fishing opportunities are regulated as part of the EU's Common Fisheries Policy and every year there are ongoing arguments about quotas and time at sea. The aim of the regulations is to preserve fish stocks and ensure sustainability, regulations are needed to protect fish stocks and fishermen recognize this, but that doesn’t make the quotas any easier. Despite quotas and regulations, Scotland remains one of the largest sea fishing nations in Europe and the Scottish Government is an integral part of the UK team negotiating fishing opportunities with other countries. The Scottish fleet is responsible for landing 66 per cent of the total UK volume of fish. You only need remember the difference in the population size between Scotland and the rest of the UK to realize Scotland catches far more fish than (within the UK as a whole) it consumes.
Agriculture in Scotland
Some 75% of Scotland’s land mass is under agricultural production, making the industry the single biggest determinant of the landscape we see around us. Scotland’s farmers, crofters and growers produce output worth around £3.0 billion a year, and are responsible for much of Scotland’s £400 million food exports, rising to £2.4 billion if whisky exports are included. Around 65,000 people are directly employed in agriculture in Scotland. Best estimates suggest that for every worker employed in agriculture another three workers are employed elsewhere. These jobs are largely in agricultural supply, and in food and drink processing.
Beef;
Scotland has almost 30% of the UK herd of breeding Beef cattle and 4% of the EU herd. The UK beef herd is the second largest in Europe, after France.
Dairy
Scotland has approximately 9% of the UK dairy herd. The UK has the third largest dairy herd in the EU after France and Germany, and the largest average herd size.
Sheep
Scotland has more than 20% of the UK breeding flock. The UK has the largest sheep flock in the EU – over a quarter of the total EU flock.
Pigs
Scotland has almost 10% of the UK pig herd. There are over 1000 holdings with pigs in Scotland and a third of these holdings are in the North East of Scotland.
Cereals
Over 454,000 hectares of cereals are grown in Scotland. Scotland’s main cereal crops are barley and wheat. More than 12% of the UK cereal area was grown in Scotland. The UK is the third largest cereal producer in the EU after France and Germany.
Other crops grown in Scotland include potatoes, oil seed rape and fruit. Scottish producers produce over 2400 tonnes of raspberries and over 4600 tonnes of strawberries per annum.
Soft fruit production tends to be concentrated in fertile areas of Tayside and Angus which has some of the best quality land in the whole of Europe. Other fruits, such as rhubarb are also grown in certain areas as are field vegetables such as carrots, peas, beans and turnips are also grown, sometimes for animal feed and sometimes for human consumption.
If you look at the percentage of UK agricultural production that comes from Scotland and then you look population percentages of Scotland compared to the rest of the UK its hard to understand how any one could say Scotland would not prosper as an independent nation.
Financial services
Scotland is already internationally recognised as the most important UK financial centre outside London and the South East. Edinburgh offers international services including global custody, asset servicing, banking, investment management, corporate finance, general / life assurance and pensions. The very word ‘Bank’ is a dirty word these days, but (unfortunately some may say), in a developed country financial services are an essential part of life. Edinburgh is already an established financial centre which is poised to serve an Independent Scotland and make the transition from devolved country to Independent country as smooth as possible.
The latest data available from the Business Register and Employment Survey show the financial industry in Scotland employs over 94,000 people with more than half of these working in banking.
Tourism
Tourism is one of Scotland's largest business sectors. It provides direct employment for 200,000 people and generates visitor spending of more than £4.5 billion a year. In the height of the summer Scotland is full to bursting with Americans tourists looking for their ancestral homes and wanting to buy their clan tartans, and Japanese tourists photographing castles, hills, bagpipes and men wearing kilts.
Even during recent years tourism in Scotland has continued to grow. Tourism has become an important part of Scottish life every where, from major cities to rural areas, many of which depend on the industry for jobs and infrastructure.
And all of this is just the tip of the iceberg, Scotland is so much more than this. Already Scotland offers a more comprehensive health care system than England, no one pays for prescription drugs and residential care for the elderly is free. Our Education system is completely different to that of the rest of UK and unlike other students, our students do not have to pay tuition fees. To generalise; the political ideology of Scotland tends to be more socialist than that of England. Scotland tends to favour a more collectivist, less private type of society than England. When schools across the UK were given the option of opting out of local authority control there was a glut of English schools clamouring to opt out, but to date only one Scottish school has opted out. Scotland WANTS its local authorities to be responsible for providing good education and it DOESN’T want schools to opt out and become part of the private sector. In Scotland, public drinking water and sewerage services are provided by a public sector corporation, Scottish Water, which is accountable to the Scottish Parliament. In England and Wales these services have been privatised. Water companies in England and Wales are private profit led companies but when water privatisation was suggested in Scotland, there was such popular rebellion against the idea that is simply never happened. The mass protest across Scotland against the unfairness of the poll tax led the way for the rest of Britain until finally this Maggie led atrocity was abolished. In discussion about Scottish independence some one recently said to me ‘’ It’s just that people also need jobs, education for kids and access to affordable medical care’’, my response to that is………….yeah I’m pretty sure that wouldn’t be a problem.
Saturday, 19 November 2011
Occupy London takes over empty USB Bank offices.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/video/2011/nov/18/occupy-london-ubs-video
Occupy London takes over empty offices owned by UBS bank - video
Early on Friday, Occupy London protesters, together with members of a squatters' action group, took over a disused office block owned by the bank UBS. Police left the scene after activists claimed squatters' rights over the block, near Liverpool Street, just outside the City of London
be sure to watch the video
Update on the 'St Pauls' protest site

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-15752168
The City of London Corporation gave notice to the Occupy London Stock Exchange (OLSX) activists to clear the "public highway" by 18:00 GMT on Thursday.
the protesters were in talks and made three simple requests. The City of London are now acting as if these talks simply didn’t happen and have so far ignored the request of the protesters.
1 The City of London are made subject to the freedom of information Act as all other public bodies are
2. The City of London publish their accounts, as all other public bodies must.
3. The City of London discloses its lobbying agreements.
That doesn’t seem too unreasonable, but apparently rather than respond to these requests, they served eviction notices.
Please click onto the link and watch the video.
Wednesday, 16 November 2011
Bah Humbug I hate Christmas.......
Why??.........no not because I’m a miserable sod who wants to ruin other peoples happiness;
But because of the constant news bulletins telling us how high street sales are either up or down compared to the same period last year, what the predictions for high street sales are over the Christmas period and what the economic implications are.
There are no words to describe my despair and loathing at the saturation level advertising for an endless stream of hideous, useless, florescent, plastic crap aimed at our children from every shop, street corner and TV channel. This seeps into our childrens minds and when the message is firmly embedded, the children plague their parents into buying things that gobble up energy and resources to produce and distribute; yet serve no useful purpose. These are things no one needs and no one can afford, they are bought by harassed parents terrified of the guilt, using the readily available Christmas credit thrust at them from all directions. Thus ensuring they are slaves to the system for another 12 months at least.
And it doesn’t stop with children; millions of young women will take out store cards they can’t afford to buy clothes that glitter and sparkle and will be worn only once. We will all buy food we don’t want and will never eat. This doesn't stop with children wanting 'toys' and young women wanting 'fashion', we are all part of this madness. Every one is stressed because they feel obligated to spend, spend, spend ……….regardless of what they actually want or need or can afford.
As if the insanity of that wasn’t enough, most of the trashy goods we buy for Christmas are made over seas in sweat shop conditions, for a wage that doesn’t even cover basic necessities, and with little regard for health and safety of the employees. This is a double whammy of the corrupt system we live in, it exploits the sweat shop employees, it deprives our own workers of jobs and it drives the consumer deeper and deeper into debt.
On Boxing Day we put out the packaging; packaging that cost us energy and resources to produce, energy and transport to collect and then gets dumped in land full sites that add to the pollution of our planet.
By the end of the week we will throw away more food that we usually buy in a week.
And why do we do all of this at Christmas…………..there is only one reason, so that the 99% stay poor and the 1% get richer. I have no idea why we are all so stupid.
I believe we are a truly decadent society, and the myth is that decadent societies fail.
Tuesday, 1 November 2011
Monday, 31 October 2011
St Paul's Dean Graeme Knowles resigns over protests
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-15524483
Another senior member of St Pauls clergy resigns, this follows last week's resignation of Dr Giles Fraser, who had been sympathetic to the activists. What a moral dilemma these people are finding themselves in
St Paul's Clerics suppress report on bankers' greed
Exclusive: Cover-up at St Paul's Clerics suppress report on bankers' greed to save church embarrassment
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/exclusive-coverup-at-st-pauls-6255110.html
‘’A highly critical report into the moral standards of bankers has been suppressed by St Paul's Cathedral amid fears that it would inflame tensions over the Occupy London tent protest.
The report, based on a survey of 500 City workers who were asked whether they thought they were worth their lucrative salaries and bonuses, was due to be published last Thursday, the day that the Canon Chancellor of St Paul's, Giles Fraser, resigned in protest at the church's tough stance.
But publication of the report, by the St Paul's Institute, has been delayed in an apparent acknowledgement that it would leave the impression that the cathedral was on the side of the protesters.’’
On the side of the protesters??....................oh dear, can’t have the world think St Pauls is in favour of social justice can we? what a terrible reputation that would give them.
Saturday, 29 October 2011
I hate the bloody conservative government
I hate the bloody conservative government
I’ve just heard on the news that this government, partly in response to the riots earlier this year, has decided that if a person is in receipt of benefit and unemployed the courts will be able to take £25.00 per week from their benefits in court fines if they break the law. This will come into effect in 2013. Previously the courts were only able to take £5.00 per week from benefits. I’ve been online and made a rough calculation. A couple, both over 18 with two young children will receive approx £150 per week, £105 income support for them and £45 tax credit for the children. Take £25.00 from that and you are left with about £120 per week for a family of four. Our lovely Prime Minister has decided this, the same man who has reported personal wealth of £30 million.
My major concern is not with the ‘crime’ what ever that was, but the family, those two children will be living well below the poverty line, and the poor parents will probably be forced into further law breaking just to feed their children. Why should the jobless be treated more harshly than those in work?? Is this just another punishment for being jobless in a society that fails to provide jobs for every one? Why should a person without a job be left with less to feed his family than another man who has committed the same crime but happens to have a job??
Occupy London protesters may be evicted

Occupy London protesters may be evicted as legal action is taken
http://www.metro.co.uk/news/880062-occupy-london-protesters-may-be-evicted-as-legal-action-is-taken-at-st-pauls-cathedral-camp
‘’ Legal action had 'regrettably become necessary' because people had refused to leave the area peacefully, according to a spokesperson for St Paul's Cathedral.’’
Well lets hope this ‘regrettable action’ doesn’t end up like the ‘regrettable evictions’ at Dale Farm. If we have scenes like that on the doorstep of St Pauls it will take more than a bit of damage limitation to recover their reputation
St Pauls like a shanty town says MP
MP says ‘St Paul's Cathedral 'like a shanty town' after anti-capitalist protest’http://www.metro.co.uk/news/879584-st-pauls-cathedral-like-a-shanty-town-after-anti-capitalist-protest
Protestors camped outside St Paul’s Cathedral have left the landmark looking like ‘a third-world shanty town’, according to MP Mark Field.
‘It looks like a third world shanty town. I have been out to places like India were they have them cheek by jowl with gleaming new buildings – it looks just like that.’'
What an idiot that man is………….maybe he hasn’t quite grasped the fact that those inequalities, the poor living in shanty towns right next to the rich who live in their ’gleaming new buildings’….
ARE CAUSED BY THE CAPITALIST SYSTEM, THE SAME SYSTEM THE PROTESTERS ARE PROTESTING AGAINST.
Thursday, 27 October 2011
Clergy resigns over St Pauls Protest.
Some of the clergy know how to do the right thing. The St Paul's Cathedral canon chancellor, Dr Giles Fraser, said he had to resign over plans to remove protesters because he could not sanction 'violence in the name of the church'. Photograph: Alex Diaz/PA
read more here
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/oct/27/st-pauls-cathedral-canon-resigns
this one doesn;t embed
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=St+Paul%27s+Cathedral+canon+resigns&aq=f
Tuesday, 25 October 2011
Occupy London, a short film...........
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





